Expansion » Al Iman School Expansion

Al Iman School Expansion

 
FOLLOW- UP MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR
 
Assalamalaykum dear Al-Iman School family,
 
The ASC wants to take a moment to express our profound appreciation to each member of the loyal parents, the dedicated staff, and the school administration for their tireless efforts and unwavering support. Your contributions have been extraordinary, and your dedication has been a pillar of strength for our community.
 
As we continue to look for a path forward for expansion, I believe this is an opportunity to learn and improve.
I'd like to share the open letter I sent to the BOD and Shura with everyone.
 
JAK and keep the school and our children in your duaa!
Wadah Sayyed
Chairman, Al-Iman School Committee 
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
 
To the Respected Board of Directors (BOD) and Honorable Shura Members of IAR,

 

Assalamu Alaikum wa Rahmatullahi wa Barakatuhu,

InshaAllah this letter finds you in a state of strong iman and well-being. In light of the recent termination of the Weston project and as we collectively contemplate the wisdom to be gleaned from this experience, I wish to address two fundamental lessons that are crucial for our journey forward: the redefinition of the BOD's role and the imperative separation of analysis from decision-making.

 

Redefining BOD Identity:

During a recent community gathering, Dr. Chaudhry described the BOD's role as that of the "bad guy." While I understand the context, it troubles me as it seems to miss the essence of leadership within the BOD. In a larger organizational context, which IAR is evolving into, culture holds as much significance as policies and bylaws.

 

While I fully acknowledge that the BOD is not a decision-making body, I firmly believe it plays a pivotal role in shaping IAR's organizational culture and identity. Therefore, I respectfully propose that the BOD reflect upon and redefine its role from merely being the "bad guy" to embracing a more encompassing role as a unifier and healer within our community.

 

How we perceive ourselves greatly influences our actions—it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. I ponder how different interactions might have unfolded if the BOD had allowed the ASC to present its case openly and engage in discourse rather than simply submitting it offline. Or, if face-to-face meetings with the ASC had been conducted to communicate unequivocally the BOD's stance, it would have been more effective than a perceived detachment.

 

If not addressed, I believe this approach could pose an existential threat to IAR, particularly as it may deter younger generations wishing to contribute to the institution's success. Unity and collaboration should be the cornerstones of our leadership identity.

 

Separation of Analysis and Decision-Making:

This approach underscores the necessity of clearly distinguishing between the analysis and decision-making phases when evaluating proposals. I do not claim that the ASC's decision to proceed with the Weston project was flawless in every aspect. However, it is paramount to recognize that it was the sole decision grounded in data and expertise across various domains, including finance, legal, construction, design, civil engineering, traffic management, commercial real estate, Sharia finances, and school policies, among others.

 

None of the entities involved in this project—the ASC, Shura, or BOD—possessed the complete spectrum of expertise needed for comprehensive planning and scrutiny. Hence, it is incumbent upon us to have the courage to seek expert guidance when analyzing data that falls beyond our expertise instead of shouldering the entire burden ourselves when venturing outside our comfort zones.

 

Key Lessons and Imperatives:

From this experience, we derive several essential lessons:

1. Expert Analysis: Leadership necessitates the active engagement of experts in relevant fields when deliberating significant projects or decisions. Expert analysis forms the bedrock of informed decisions.

 

2. Objective Decision-MakingObjectivity is paramount. By distinctively separating analysis from decisions, we ensure choices rest upon factual data and expert insights rather than subjective factors. Objective decisions are both comprehensible and convincing.

 

3. Transparency and Accountability: We must cultivate a culture of transparency and accountability within our community. Clear communication and accountability are indispensable for informed decision-making and the unity of our community.

 

4. Recognizing Expertise: Acknowledging and respecting expertise is essential. This does not imply unwavering adherence to expert recommendations but rather the humility to seek expert counsel when warranted and acknowledge our limitations.

 

Allah repeatedly emphasizes the significance of acquiring knowledge and making well-informed choices in the Quran. As leaders entrusted with the welfare of our community, we bear the solemn responsibility of making decisions that reflect wisdom, foresight, and objectivity.

 

By committing to the separation of analysis and decision-making and by wholeheartedly valuing the contributions of experts, we can collectively endeavor towards a future characterized by sound decision-making, impartial assessments, and the flourishing of our Islamic Association. Let this experience serve as a reminder of the pivotal role of culture and the invaluable contributions of experts in assisting leaders in making objective decisions.

 

May Allah guide our intentions, bestow upon us wisdom, and shower our community with strength and unity.

 

JAK,
Wadah Sayyed
Chairman, Al-Iman School Committee